DiscoverCrime Talk with Scott ReischHain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?
Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?

Update: 2025-11-10
Share

Description

Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist (No. 24-724), argued November 4, 2025. In this case, the Justices examine whether a federal appellate court must vacate a district court's final judgment when it later concludes the case was improperly removed because a non-diverse defendant was wrongly dismissed at the outset—pitting strict jurisdictional rules against the need for finality in complex product-liability litigation. Hear counsel and the Court test the limits of Caterpillar v. Lewis, diversity jurisdiction, and what happens when federal courts try to fix their mistakes after the fact.

Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.

#HainCelestial #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #DiversityJurisdiction #CrimeTalk

Comments 
In Channel
loading
00:00
00:00
x

0.5x

0.8x

1.0x

1.25x

1.5x

2.0x

3.0x

Sleep Timer

Off

End of Episode

5 Minutes

10 Minutes

15 Minutes

30 Minutes

45 Minutes

60 Minutes

120 Minutes

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?

Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist — Can a Jurisdiction Error Be "Cured" After Final Judgment?